Archive for rants

What’s going on in the publishing industry

In my daily search for interesting news I came across this article.  The gist if you don’t want to read is that a budding novelist boiled his girlfriend.  Disturbing I know.  What kind of world do we live in that we find this kind of thing interesting?  The murderers book is called Canaballistic Instincts… I am guessing it was semi-autobiographical?  This article got me thinking about the publishing industry in general and how the title of that book can actually be likened to the industry.   Why?

The publishing industry does not support innovation by inventing new techniques of publishing, new methods of investigating ways to publish unpublished authors, neither is it doing anything to investigate the wave of web 2.0 that has become part of life and work for a lot of us.  Why is that?  Is it perhaps deep down that the model just wouldn’t work in that environment.  Cory Doctorow has certainly given in a good Aussie go.  This got me thinking… what are they doing?  Other than the ill-fated e-book (which I think is covered well on Copyblogger this week… note the comments) what are they doing to secure the market?

The competitive side of the market is often highlighted as a “high barrier to entry”.  Personally, I think that’s another way of saying… “look guys we don’t bet on a losing horse” and let’s face it… 99% of new authors won’t make money IF they ever get published.  Has the long tail  taught the publishing industry anything? I think not.  There are a host of people who have learned how to use the web and make money from writing… I wonder why the publishing industry, especially in fiction circles, hasn’t capitalized on this yet?

Technorati Tags: , ,

Owning a home may not be a sound investment?

Over breakfast yesterday morning I was watching Sunrise, a local morning show. They had a man from Melbourne talking about property ownership from a perspective that I wasn’t familiar with. His core argument was that leasing (and he conceded) and renting were better than owning. He cited some examples which you can read here of the going rise in costs that I think show the overall trend in this country. What interested me was that he was a lessor and said, ‘this side of the grave I will not own a house even though I have owned five of them!’.

I was gobsmacked! This was an interesting point of view because it’s a common, if not unmovable, dream in Australia to own your home. It’ called the ‘great Australian dream‘ here at to be honest it’s now out of reach of more people than it has ever been in the history of this country. The point that got my attention the most was that putting your money into a managed fund or stocks may actually get you better financial returns. Several factors like: maintenance, rates and the like were cited as on-going expenses. I have to admit as I have before… the place I am living in now is fairly dodgy! As a renter I wonder about the future of something that may or may not be sustainable.

There is a lot of rhetoric about it being a sound investment but in closing this short post I would like to point out that homeownership is a dream for a lot of us. It’s the intangible desire to have a place we can call ‘home’ that is somehow built into our psyche. That goes beyond sound economics and is something else entirely.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Is downloading music truly evil?

I recently came across this on my news website: Music giants sue single mum over downloads.  What burned in my mind was the level of the fine handed down for the music copyright infringement and the amount of subsequent court costs. Over 200k! That’s a lot of money. At the end of the article the writer suggests that the record company could have sued the woman for amounts in the millions if they have of looked at her files (around 1800) that she had illegally downloaded. So in thinking about the fine (more than you get for drink driving offenses in this country) I thought is it a dangerous thing or perhaps an ‘evil’ thing to be downloading music?

Definition of evil

Evil is defined as something wrong or injurious to someone else. Evil single mom pictured in the above article has downloaded 24 songs which landed her in court. I think it may not have gotten that far if another company wasn’t involved… which I think is more than likely the issue here. That said, I have framed this debate thus: is downloading music evil? Evil means I injure, harm or do certain bad things to others because of my cruel nature. Consider for a moment these people who have been cruel to animals in Queensland. Now that is evil towards animals. Note the fines and compare them with what the “evil” lady got for downloading music. Is there evil there? I think not.

I must be evil

When I was a youngster I frequently copied songs off the radio to listen to on tape afterwards. I would often take this tape to my friends house and play in there. This tape was copied and distributed to other ‘tape players’ in the house. I did this with the complete and full intent of ripping off the recording industry. Yes, I confess. I haven’t recorded a movie directly to DVD yet from my camcorder because it’s broken. I do not drink and drive, I don’t rob people, I don’t steal, lie or even cheat on my taxes. Yet all of those things combined wouldn’t amount to a fine of this size. To be honest, I doubt those artists would have even come close to generating that much from each song… given the ridiculous nature of the royalties they get. I am injuring artists. I am stealing their money. What a complete bundle of evil I am. Can you forgive me? You see the problem is I have limewire and well I am addicted. Is there a ‘pirates’ hotline I can call?

Are you evil?

If you download music you are evil. Let’s face it. You are taking away the right of Lars Ulrich to buy another mansion. After all, you are evil. Why don’t we ever ask the question: how come Metallica make so much money for doing something as frivolous as making music while the rest of us have to work until our eyes bleed? My father works for a very low wage in an Multiple Sclerosis  home and he would put in more work than most in the rock industry. Not to mention the millions of people who have a creative talent and never make enough money to pay the bills *cough* *cough* ME *cough*.

In a society where we face problems like global warming, poverty, sickness, disease and death surely our resources can be better spent elsewhere. Surely, there will be a time when we will move into common sense and make business models like Magnatune and Jonathan Coulton’s regular place. Radiohead are even involved and they are huge! I for one, think that we really need to move beyond silly court cases and towards actual solutions. These two I have shown above are but a handful of the good ideas that are floating around the web at present. If the long tail has taught us anything it’s that there is room for everyone no matter how eclectic, strange or downright nasty they may be. Surely, this nonsense has to come to an end some time.

Technorati Tags: ,

Why you should do things to help others… a note.

I am moving house at the moment and we finally got to see the place we are moving into today in full detail.  I have NEVER in my life moved into a house that was so filthy.  Normally, I wouldn’t blog about this kind of thing but I mean MY GOD!  The windows were dirty, the walls had black scuff marks on them, the oven was unclean and so I could go on.  Have you ever had this problem?  Here are four reasons why shouldn’t do the same thing.

Remember the Golden Rule? 

Do unto others?  Why not think of the poor sucker who is going to move in after you.  How about them?  Now we have to clean the house just to make it habitable.  Why not buck current trends and scare somebody by doing something helpful.  I sure wish the person that came before me in my new house had done me this way… now that I have all this CLEANING to do!

A sense of personal respect

To me somebody who leaves a rental property in that kind of state (unless physically or mentally incapacitated) is saying, ‘you know what I couldn’t give a royal damn about whoever is coming after me.’  I see this kind of thinking on the road all the time.  Why do people compete for a space on the freeway?  Don’t you know that one day you will be DEAD and then where will you be rushing too?  Take you time and be courteous.   People who have no personal respect treat others the way they have been treated themselves.   Without recognising it we become the very thing we desire not to become by virtue of the fact that we are displaying the very behaviour we find so abhorrent in others.   So have some personal respect and do something you admire so others can likewise admire you.  Starting thinking about how you effect people’s lives and especially what you can do to make a positive difference… even if they never see you doing it!

All I have really said in this post is that you should display the behaviour that you yourself think you deserved to be treated with.  Now, this is a note to remind us in the world of business not to think that we must not have a different mindset when we rub shoulders with our colleagues.   Who you are on the field is who you are in life.  Don’t give me that, ‘yeah but this is business,’ poppycock … that means you choose to be an arrogant so and so who shelves his morals when convenient.  Don’t do this!  Be different by really being kind and caring about those you know.  Why not frighten the hell of them by doing something out of the blue for someone you hate?  I am telling you this a really liberating way to live.

Really the golden rule could be put this way, ‘Do unto others what you think you deserve (or would like) done to you.  I think Jesus got this right!  Now, if you will excuse me I have packing and cleaning to do.

Technorati Tags: ,

Does it pay to do the right thing?

I am moving house at the moment and something really ticked me off the other day. When we rented the place we have now the owner told us if we fixed the garden he would come and pick up the rubbish from the garden. Face to face he said this. Now, later when we contacted him to come and collect the rubbish he didn’t come and get it! I was mad. Now I could name the person and probably give you his address but would that really make me feel better? So I have decided to vent in this manner: Does it pay to do the right thing?

Why bother giving?

We live in a world where materialism reigns. I am reading a book at the moment by Professor Chris Argyris called Reasons and Rationalization in which he argues that people often create defensive reasoning to protect themselves from having to learn. I have met people who are in need and I help them… not because I am a saint but because it’s the right thing to do. Letting people go on there merry way when you can help is wrong. Listen to yourself when you say when you make excuses for not doing the right thing. You are using defensive reasoning so that you can feel justified by doing nothing. Instead of always taking from people… why not shock someone and give. Take just one step to ruining this cesspool of materialism WE created.

It’s a great thing to take advantage of others for your own self gain?

The whole world use ‘dirty’ politics to step over people on a daily basis. If we all just turned around and changed our thinking a revolution could begin. If we all started giving, sharing, building things together instead of retreating back to our suburban hideaways… the world would change. What would it take to stop being ambitious? I don’t think this generation has what it takes in order to make it quite frankly. All they seem to care about is what kind of life they will lead. Where are the conscientious? Where are those that actually want to make things better for all instead of the solitary one? All I see are people taking advantage of me and ripping me off! I am saying this as much to me as I am to anybody reading this: stop taking advantage if you are and start creating opportunity. All it takes is a shift of thought.

Collaboration is dead?

I have met many kind hearted people in my time and some of them I work with. However, the majority of people I meet are so utterly self-consumed that it’s truly sickening. Can I hold people at fault when I find myself equally as bad? I think not. What I want to see happen again is collaboration. I don’t mean the style of ‘group work’ that they teach in universities. That’s bogus nonsense. I am speaking of true honest to GOD collaboration. The kind of working together that gave the world cybernetics, the systems movement and so on. What we have now is advanced siloitis. A silo is something you use to store wheat in not build knowledge and work that can power us into the next century (if Al Gore is right we may be dead by then anyway). Let’s stop retreating to our ‘areas of specialisation’ and work together to form a powerful whole. Sorry, I am dreaming aren’t I? People are too petty to work together because the blinding lights of ambition cripple us. I will move on to my next point.

It’s good to be selfish?

I read an interesting blog post by Steve Pavlina the other day in which he argued that selfishness and selflessness are strongly related. I tend to agree. Our western mindset focuses on creating logic boxes that form limiting belief structures in our brain which form in us silly dichotomies. The strategic view is to consider the interacting wholes and any part relevant and then move between them. I find that there is overwhelming ambition in modern society but very little of what Steve Pavlina calls selflessness (service to others in his words). There are some things that we need and some things others need both at the same time. You cannot dismiss one without understanding the other nor can you remove one and keep the other. People who are overly selfish are so for a deep seated reason. The person who lied to me about taking away my garden rubbish probably sleeps like a baby because he is extremely selfish. Me on the other hand gets angry at the thought of it. Now I am being selfish because I want to find this person and dump my rubbish on his front lawn! If I continue down this path I will slip into ‘revenge’ mode and want justice for something that really isn’t that important.

Revenge is noble?

Consider the idea of revenge. The oft quoted ‘spanish proverb’: revenge is a dish best served cold reminds me that getting my own back cuts me on the same level as my enemy. To get revenge is not noble neither is it grand… even though for a moment it may seem that way. When you stoop to the level of your betrayer (in my case the person who made me a promise then recanted) you are now the same as they are. It’s noble to walk away and let it go. It’s right to do that but it does not pay. As you imagine revenge sitting there in your garden think of this: why am I now thinking the same way as the person who did this to me … because you are being selfish. You have now fallen to the bottom. Do yourself a favour and dip to your selfless side and think through what you are doing. I guarantee you that initially as you do this it will be hard but after a while you will find it easier to let things go. It takes practice, imagination and time but it’s all worth it.

Clearly there is a big cost in doing the right thing and sometimes the cost is great. Consider the life of some of the greatest leaders we have known: Jesus, Gandi, Martin Luther King and so on. What price did they pay for doing what was right? A price that some would say is far too great. I reckon, we all are faced with paying a price each day for doing what is right. Pay the price because by not paying it might make yourself as worse as those who didn’t pay for it for you. If you begin paying it, you just never know what it could to do to your life.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Why is business so heartless?

Sometimes I wonder why people forget that human beings are the ones that work in a business. As these people say: it’s easy to maintain your heart and keep your business growing. Recent trends in emotional intelligence point us towards the need to pay more attention to these things. Have you ever noticed that in each place you have worked there seems to be an essence to it? There is a spirit to the workplace. There is a heart. Modern business focuses a lot on making money and profiteering but very few businesses focus on the heart. Now, a wise man once said to me you cannot have a business and have a heart at the same time. Not true.

Some people put profits before people and in their mind separate business from being human. Phrases like, ‘well this is business’ is your way of saying, ‘I value money over human relationships.’ Another one I hear is, ‘I am in business to make money.’ Of course you are but exactly who are you going to make money from? Who is going to help you make money? People. Behind every employee is a heart. Each time you mistreat people you shifting your heart away from business and onto things that are less important.

Heartless people… heartless practice

I am amazed at how people think they can succeed by bullying and coercing people into making them do things. Recently, a person who was working for me was told that they might not have any work. Instead of talking to me directly they went straight to my supervisor and told them I had to hire them because of their qualifications. When that didn’t work they went even higher. My reaction was one of shock… all I said was there might be no work. When I was asked about it I had no idea how to respond and felt as if my role as supervisor had been marginalised. Due to this I was later forced to remove two other people who were less qualified but had more heart. Qualifications are important but not more important than the human spirit.

I have had close personal friends do me this way as well, people who favoured the business end and the money in preference to friendship or collegiality. I have heard it said that we should never go into business with our friends because the heart decisions we will have to make will obscure our judgement. On the other hand I have also heard that if I can’t trust the people I am in business with then my business is unlikely to succeed. I would say it this way, trust people you are in business with and treat them with the heart first. Never allow your desire for money overrule your heart in business. This is a great mistake and one that you will live to regret for years.

Keeping the balance

There is however a chance that you will look for heart issues where there are none. You can always put people first and make those kinds of choices but there comes a time when decisions need to be made for the sake of the business. What happens when you can’t pay someone? Wave goodbye and say ‘good luck’. No. There is still a way to deal with this in the heart way. Help the person find alternative employment. Exhaust all avenues, go the extra mile. People love to do the wrong thing and then make excuses for it. ‘Well I just had to let him go.’ Of course … but how did you set them on their way… what did you do to help them? After all, didn’t they work for you for years? How about showing some respect for the time they gave to you outside of regular hours? Sadly, we keep expecting more for less.

In closing this post I would like to remind you that you are a human being first and whatever comes next second. Your identity is born through the fact that you are a human. When you say things like: business is business. You are separating the heart from business. Business is heartless because we have placed the heart on the outside when we make decisions. Even in contemporary so-called spiritual practices we do this by focusing on what we can accumulate for ourself instead of focusing on what we can do for and with others. I would ask you to rethink how you handle your customers and your co-workers. Do you treat them with heart or as a resource to be exploited. People will always have heart no matter how tough their exterior may be. Why not bring the heart back to your business and do what’s right.

The housing affordability crisis

At the moment in the Australian media there is a huge outcry about the housing affordability crisis. Some stats I heard on the radio yesterday say that only 39% of houses are affordable now in comparision with 96% in 2001. Where I live in the north of Brisbane there is a group of houses where a high rate of crime was reported. I went for a walk there the other day and began to think to myself what’s happened that the present state of affairs has come to this. Looking at the big cities of the world like London, New York or Paris it would seem that this is not a new problem for them. Housing affordability may have been a luxury in Australia for years but now it’s a luxury that I know I can’t afford.

How does one cope with these realities? A bit further north from me there were groups of families using the exhibition grounds as a temporary accommodation because they couldn’t find homes to rent. In the Philippines there are entire shanty towns built out of rubbish and left over bits of metal. A positive for me is that I can say, “at least I can afford it.” However, I cannot see anytime soon that I won’t be renting. I have never owned my own home and if things keep increasing then I probably never will. Thank God I can afford to rent but that is not really much of a comfort when you are kicked out after the house is sold. I mean we have lived in eight houses in the past eleven years. In this last five years we have moved five times.

It’s not all bad though. When I can eventually afford a house at least I can say that I know what I like. Although I still dream of owning a home it will be many, many years before I can afford it (given present trends). Are you in the same boat?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Solving the cat overpopulation problem

I recently stumbled upon this article http://torontosun.com/Lifestyle/2007/08/05/4395258-sun.html and they mentioned that they have a problem with cat overpopulation. The funny thing is so do we here in Australia. I mean my God there are cats everywhere. One of the things that annoys me a lot is that very few people seem to be worried about it. It’s funny because a cat really cannot control the way they breed or even how they speak. Nevertheless one only has to venture down the road here in Brisbane to the animal welfare league to find even more examples of much the same thing. There are two typical types of response to this problem:

  1. Kill the stray cats
  2. Capture, De-sex and re-home the cats

Now being a person who loves animals I think the latter is much better than the former. This article is a great example of what I would call framing. You see framing is the way in which a person places a problem (in my language) in this invisible forcefield in which it cannot escape. Usually the result is a dichotomy of some sort where you have to pick one solution over another. Therefore we either kill the cats or re-home them… these are our only options. However, both of these solutions are getting to the root cause of the problem – even though I believe 2. is an excellent solution. Solving the cat overpopulation problem requires an understanding of three key things that make it mess it is today:

  1. How did it come to be
  2. What are the systemic factors that cause it to be
  3. Can we change the systemic factors in order to stop the problem from happening

Now if we look at the bigger picture view (systemic factors) we get can get perspectives and look through them to see what might help solve our problem. Suppose we could make a moron-o-meter and attach it to deadbeats who decide to not take care of their pets. This would allow us to track the morons and either:

  1. Kill them
  2. Capture, De-sex and re-home the morons

Let’s be honest here. The problem’s creators weren’t the cats. It’s the people that year after year allow the cats to breed without having a shred of decency for their neighbours. Would education fix this problem? I doubt it. Let’s stop pointing a wavey finger at the people that cause this problem and take it up to a higher level where we can see the treetops. Suppose we find the people that made the morons and:

  1. Kill them
  2. Capture, De-sex and re-home the morons

Who then is next in the chain of blame? The more you zoom out the more the complicated it becomes to understand why cats are taking over Canada. The people who have recognised the problem have offered us two solutions. But are there more. Could we find the people responsible and through some ‘Judge Judy’ experience make them change? If we could how would we do it. Can we create cats that don’t breed? If we did would it be ethical or politically responsible? What reasons are there that cause people to allow cats to overtake a whole nation? Say we look at the problem from an economic point of view for a minute. What is the cost of running a shelter? How many cats actually make it? How much would it cost to reeducate a whole community to stop this practice? What would the legal ramifications be if we removed people from the streets who breed cats illegally?

So here we have a bona fide mess. One that just won’t quit. The problem has been “framed” to mean “kill” VS. “rehome”. Are there other ways that we could come up with answers that could dissolve the need for “kill VS. re-home”? I wonder. Until we can change the systemic factors we are stuck with cats overtaking the world as we know it.

After I posted this article I noticed that the animal welfare league of Queensland are supporting a national de-sexing program which I think is a clever way of slowly reducing the numbers. These people do great work.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,