Here’s a short thought:
Problems can only be practically solved because of the things we take to practically restrict their solving them. People often blame politics, the environment, marketing, accounting but the biggest issue is what’s feasible or practical to do, given the known constraints. There is a big difference between assumption and actual barrier, yet the actual barriers can be nothing else but thought in the beginning even though it may actually be a real issue that would hinder the problem solving effort. Thinking, as someone said (sorry), doesn’t make it so. The truth may be what happens after we do something, not sure about that; yet there is a level of pragmatism that always drives decision making in business. We can’t do this because of that and we can’t do that because of this. We need to think through these barriers carefully to see if they are real or a matter of our discourse.
One example happened to me years ago when I tried my hand at business. We kept making decisions because ‘we had to’ and over a period of time the direction I blissfully steered the business to failed. Each decision was thought out, reasoned over, implemented with an eye to improvement. Yet as complexity unfolded, new ideas emerged which reset my decision parameters and modified my heuristics, I realised I was playing a fools game. There was no ‘right’ answer, only what was feasible and known to me at the time and with the resources that I had to use. Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber talked about this years ago, yet in all the work I have done, I have seen little progress in this regard. Complexity is a bitch. Scholars like the late Herbert Simon called it decision making under ambiguity, what decisions are made that don’t contain that? Tell me if you know.
The hidden tiger of decision making and complex problem solving is complexity. It laughs at us when we confront it with our ideas, and changes shape the minute we make a choice. What’s known becomes unknown and what seemed ‘right’ becomes not right after the action has been taken. Is the truth something that happens to an idea as William James said? Maybe. Perhaps the truth is not just what happens to the idea but the reasons why it didn’t work in the first place. It is elusive, nevertheless.