<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resisting your hearts desire: a personal lesson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lukehoughton.com/2008/08/24/resisting-your-hearts-desire-a-personal-lesson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lukehoughton.com/2008/08/24/resisting-your-hearts-desire-a-personal-lesson/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about personal development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Houghton</title>
		<link>http://lukehoughton.com/2008/08/24/resisting-your-hearts-desire-a-personal-lesson/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukehoughton.com/?p=338#comment-889</guid>
		<description>@Al thanks for the kind words... 

@Alan I think I understand what you have said here and it ends well.  Not that those two things are related.  However, I think that in the end of it... perhaps I need a better definition of heart.  I learned something from reading that.  And yes Maslow needs to be kept in the box.  I will read this again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Al thanks for the kind words&#8230; </p>
<p>@Alan I think I understand what you have said here and it ends well.  Not that those two things are related.  However, I think that in the end of it&#8230; perhaps I need a better definition of heart.  I learned something from reading that.  And yes Maslow needs to be kept in the box.  I will read this again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanAJ01</title>
		<link>http://lukehoughton.com/2008/08/24/resisting-your-hearts-desire-a-personal-lesson/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanAJ01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukehoughton.com/?p=338#comment-888</guid>
		<description>Welcome to Houghton&#039;s Hierarchy of Mush!

I am drawn to the expression &quot;a sense of inner goo&quot;. My problem with the whole &quot;heart&#039;s desire&quot; business is distinguishing a &quot;heart&#039;s&quot; desire from any other kind of impulse. So while I would agree that an absence of harmony between desire and actuality is ultimately unhealthy, I still don&#039;t find myself aligned with the views expressed in your article.

Problem 1: the &quot;level&quot; of desire. This calls Maslow to mind, but without delving into that can of worms...what distinguishes a &quot;heart&#039;s&quot; desire from other desires? The mushy, gooey, irrationality of it? What differentiates this from neuroticism? My point is that the sense of inner goo is an emotional response to a counter-factual narrative. That is, your emotional focus is on an alternative to your real situation, and this alternative is constructed in response to a blend of desires where (and this bit&#039;s important) desires that are currently being met have lower priority than those that are not.

Problem 2: the &quot;nobility&quot; of desire. This comes back to &quot;by their fruits shall ye know them&quot;. When we talk about a &quot;heart&#039;s desire&quot;, we are implicitly asserting that it is good: good for us and, perhaps, morally good (particularly if you equate it with &quot;vocation&quot; or &quot;avocation&quot;). Well, I&#039;m not here to challenge your religious views (or perhaps I am) but a degree of scepticism is in order here. Most of us are capable of great things, but let&#039;s say 5,000,000,000 of us are too busy struggling to survive (back in your box, Maslow!). If my &quot;heart&#039;s desire&quot; benefits myself and a privileged few, is it really preferable, ethically, to a more considered sacrifice of self to the greater good?

That said, I&#039;m sure there are better things for me to be doing than commenting on your blog, Luke. Yet, somehow, this seems to be my highest priority (why else would I be doing it?) :)

Interesting... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to Houghton&#8217;s Hierarchy of Mush!</p>
<p>I am drawn to the expression &#8220;a sense of inner goo&#8221;. My problem with the whole &#8220;heart&#8217;s desire&#8221; business is distinguishing a &#8220;heart&#8217;s&#8221; desire from any other kind of impulse. So while I would agree that an absence of harmony between desire and actuality is ultimately unhealthy, I still don&#8217;t find myself aligned with the views expressed in your article.</p>
<p>Problem 1: the &#8220;level&#8221; of desire. This calls Maslow to mind, but without delving into that can of worms&#8230;what distinguishes a &#8220;heart&#8217;s&#8221; desire from other desires? The mushy, gooey, irrationality of it? What differentiates this from neuroticism? My point is that the sense of inner goo is an emotional response to a counter-factual narrative. That is, your emotional focus is on an alternative to your real situation, and this alternative is constructed in response to a blend of desires where (and this bit&#8217;s important) desires that are currently being met have lower priority than those that are not.</p>
<p>Problem 2: the &#8220;nobility&#8221; of desire. This comes back to &#8220;by their fruits shall ye know them&#8221;. When we talk about a &#8220;heart&#8217;s desire&#8221;, we are implicitly asserting that it is good: good for us and, perhaps, morally good (particularly if you equate it with &#8220;vocation&#8221; or &#8220;avocation&#8221;). Well, I&#8217;m not here to challenge your religious views (or perhaps I am) but a degree of scepticism is in order here. Most of us are capable of great things, but let&#8217;s say 5,000,000,000 of us are too busy struggling to survive (back in your box, Maslow!). If my &#8220;heart&#8217;s desire&#8221; benefits myself and a privileged few, is it really preferable, ethically, to a more considered sacrifice of self to the greater good?</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m sure there are better things for me to be doing than commenting on your blog, Luke. Yet, somehow, this seems to be my highest priority (why else would I be doing it?) <img src='http://lukehoughton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Interesting&#8230; <img src='http://lukehoughton.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al at 7P</title>
		<link>http://lukehoughton.com/2008/08/24/resisting-your-hearts-desire-a-personal-lesson/comment-page-1/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Al at 7P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lukehoughton.com/?p=338#comment-886</guid>
		<description>Hi Luke - yeah, we can follow through with our responsibilities (day job, errands, chores, etc...) but if we don&#039;t address our inner passions then everything else will suffer.  Hope you get through this patch Luke, and thanks for reminding the rest of us to develop our desires!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Luke &#8211; yeah, we can follow through with our responsibilities (day job, errands, chores, etc&#8230;) but if we don&#8217;t address our inner passions then everything else will suffer.  Hope you get through this patch Luke, and thanks for reminding the rest of us to develop our desires!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
